Aerospace First Article Inspection Software

Build AS9102 Rev C FAIRs for aerospace programs with auto-ballooning, GD&T capture, CMM import, and validation that catches rejections before your customer does.

The hard part is keeping the drawing, the characteristics, the results, and the objective evidence aligned through every revision, every special process, and every customer template. GroundControl keeps all four in one workflow.

  • AS9102 Rev C Forms 1, 2, and 3 with traceable evidence
  • Auto-ballooning and GD&T capture built for dense aerospace drawings
  • CMM import, Net-Inspect export, and customer-specific templates
  • Validation checks that prevent missing characteristics and form errors before submission
PCC
Sanmina
Summit

Build AS9102 FAIRs for aerospace programs

Everything a first article package needs, from the ballooned print to the export your customer accepts.

AS9102 Rev C Forms 1-3

Generate part, product, and characteristic accountability for Forms 1-3 without retyping anything twice. Forms stay linked to the drawing revision they were built from.

Auto-ballooning and characteristic capture

Upload a 2D PDF and extract dimensions, notes, and callouts automatically. Balloon numbering holds when a drawing revises, so you are not rebuilding a FAIR from scratch every ECN.

GD&T and tolerance recognition

Capture ASME Y14.5 feature control frames, datum references, and limit tolerances as structured GD&T characteristics rather than free text.

CMM and metrology import

Map results from PC-DMIS, Calypso, Verisurf, PolyWorks, and CSV or Excel exports directly onto ballooned features. Hardware from Hexagon, Zeiss, and Mitutoyo is supported through the same import path.

Micro-Vu
Zeiss
Hexagon

and more...

Evidence and certification packages

Attach material certs, special process certs, and test reports to the records they support. Export to AS9102, Net-Inspect, Excel, or a customer-specific template.

What AS9102 actually requires

AS9102 is the SAE standard that defines first article inspection requirements for aerospace. The current revision is AS9102C, which specifies three forms that together prove every design characteristic on a part was verified against released engineering data, with objective evidence linked to each result.

Form 1

Part Number Accountability

Identifies the part, ties the FAIR to a specific drawing revision, records whether the FAI is full or partial and why, and accounts for every item on the bill of material including sub-assemblies and standard catalog hardware.

Form 2

Product Accountability

Covers raw material with heat and lot traceability, special processes performed by approved sources, standard catalog and COTS items, and functional testing. This is where Nadcap-accredited special process evidence lands.

Form 3

Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation

Lists every ballooned characteristic with its requirement, the measured result, the method or gauge used, the inspector, and any nonconformance reference.

If you want the field-by-field walkthrough, we wrote one: how to actually fill out an AS9102.

There is also a free AS9102C Excel template and FAI checklist with no form fill.

When an aerospace program requires a new FAI

A new or partial first article inspection is required whenever a change could invalidate the results of the original FAI. AS9102 frames this as characteristics being invalidated or not represented by the previous inspection, and it requires a documented change management process to make that call.

A full FAI covers every characteristic. A partial FAI covers only the characteristics affected by the change, and you document which ones and why. Some primes restrict this so be sure to read the clause on the purchase order before you decide.

New to the purchase order side of this? Start with our introduction to aerospace ordering and PO review.

New FAI Triggers

  • New part introduction or the first production run of a part
  • Design or specification changes, including engineering change notices and model revisions
  • Changes to the manufacturing process, tooling, inspection method, or production location
  • A change of supplier or of an approved special process source
  • An extended lapse in production. Two years is a common threshold, but confirm the interval your customer's clause specifies
  • Customer-directed re-accomplishment

How GroundControl fits an aerospace quality workflow

GroundControl removes the transcription work and keeps every requirement linked to the evidence that satisfies it. Your engineers still decide what is critical and how to interpret intent.

  • Auto-balloon the drawing and extract characteristics in minutes instead of hours
  • Apply GD&T and tolerance logic consistently, so two engineers ballooning the same print produce the same characteristic set
  • Import CMM and metrology results and map them onto ballooned features without re-keying
  • Link certifications and evidence, including material, heat treat, plating, and NDT, to the specific records they support
  • Run validation checks for missing data, mismatched revisions, and form errors before anything leaves the building
  • Export a customer-ready package in AS9102, Net-Inspect, Excel, or a customer-specific template

For the mechanics of the ballooning engine, see first article inspection software. For flowdown and SCAR workflows across your sub-tiers, see supplier quality management software.

Documentation failures

Why aerospace FAIRs get rejected

Most FAI rejections are documentation failures, not part failures. The part is usually good. The package cannot prove it.

  1. Missing characteristics or unballooned drawing notes

  2. Incorrect or missing special process documentation, or a process performed by a source the customer has not approved

  3. Wrong revision level or a configuration mismatch between the FAIR and the released drawing

  4. Form errors: wrong part numbers, missing signatures, transposed tolerances

  5. Missing supporting evidence such as material certs, CMM reports, or test results

We broke these down with examples in the top five reasons for an FAI rejection. If ballooning is where things go wrong for your team, title block red flags is the one to read first.

Results from aerospace and defense suppliers

Mass Precision
Spartan Aerospace Group

Mass Precision · precision metal fabrication, multi-site across the US, Mexico, and Malaysia

100+
FAIRs completed in month one
40+
Users onboarded in rollout
< 1 month
Time to ROI

Mass Precision moved off software that produced enough errors to trigger a formal corrective action. After switching, they onboarded 40 users across two languages, more than doubled monthly FAIR output, and have had zero rejections.

GroundControl is a very easy to use software! The implementation has been great, and the whole team has had no issues using GroundControl and we really appreciate the product. It's really helped us out.
Michael Hamilton, Quality Manager, Mass Precision
Read the Mass Precision case study

Ready for faster, cleaner aerospace FAIRs?

See how GroundControl reduces rework and improves first-pass acceptance.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions from aerospace quality teams evaluating AS9102 FAIR workflows.

Contact GroundControl
Ground Control Software, Inc. is ITAR registered. The government-cloud FAI and PO Review module has achieved FedRAMP Moderate Equivalency following an independent 3PAO assessment, runs in AWS GovCloud (US), and may handle CUI under DoD guidance. Commercial and unrelated module deployments are outside that assessed boundary.
Yes. GroundControl imports results from PC-DMIS, Calypso, Verisurf, and PolyWorks, and from CSV or Excel exports, mapping them directly onto ballooned characteristics in Form 3. Hardware from Hexagon, Zeiss, and Mitutoyo is supported through the same path, so teams keep the metrology stack they already run.
Onboarding takes about 30 minutes. AdvancedPCB completed 61 FAIRs in month one after training operators in under 30 minutes. Mass Precision onboarded more than 40 users across two languages and completed over 100 FAIRs in the first month of full deployment, both reaching ROI in under a month.
A full FAI verifies every design characteristic. A partial FAI covers only the characteristics affected by a change, with documentation of which ones and why.
Whenever a change could invalidate the original inspection results. Common triggers are new part introduction, design or specification changes, changes to process, tooling, inspection method or location, a change of supplier or approved special process source, an extended production lapse, and customer-directed re-accomplishment. AS9102C requires a documented change management process for making that determination.